Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Century old Fiji Times falls victim to media crackdown

Baltimore News - 30 June 2010


The Rupert Murdoch-owned Fiji Times, the Pacific island-nation's oldest newspaper, is being forced out of business.

The newspaper has fallen victim to a ruthless media crackdown by the military "government" which seized power in a coup in December 2006.

The crackdown is a further extension of tight laws and regulations that already control newspapers, radio and television in the country, as well as online media. The new act, "The Media Industry Development Decree 2010," has been universally condemned.

Under the new "law," the Fiji Times has been given three months to sell out to local interests or close. Mr Murdoch's News Limited will need to be removed as owner within 90 days or the newspaper will be closed, according to Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum of Fiji's Attorney'General's office. Foreign entities are no longer allowed to own more than 10% of any media enterprise.

Established in 1869, the 141 year old Fiji Times is the largest daily newspaper in the country. The 'Times has maintained its independence through three coups in the nation. Since Army Commodore Frank Bainimarama seized power in the latest government-overthrow on 5 December 2006, the Fiji Times has maintained its independence holding the military dictatorship to account. When the coup took place the military placed armed army officers as censors in the country's major media outlets, including the 'Times, to prohibit the publication of any "propaganda." The 'Times refused to publish under those conditions and a day later the military relented and allowed the more than century-old newspaper to publish without censorship.

A rocky road followed however with the newspaper, and its readers, subjected to ongoing harrasment by the military. Following the Fijian constitutional crisis last year, censorship was reintroduced at the Fiji Times. Censors were placed in the newsrooms of the paper.

Foreign journalists are also subject to the country's new censorship laws. Fiji now maintains a "blacklist," and writers that have penned articles unfavourable to the "government" are arrested on arrival, detained, and usually deported. Fairfax journalist Michael Field is one of those on the "blacklist," and was deported back to New Zealand after arriving in Fiji on June 15 in 2007.

On February 26 2008 Russell Hunter, the publisher of the Fiji Sun, was deported despite an order issued by the High Court to stop his expulsion. The deportation drew local and international condemnation because of the threat it posed to media freedom in Fiji.

Mr Hunter, an Australian, was seized in his home and was held in custody overnight before he was placed on a flight the following morning from Nadi to Sydney.

A statement released at the time by the "government," said: "This declaration follows a proper investigation by the relevant authorities, which clearly established that Mr Hunter was conducting himself in a manner prejudicial to the peace, defence, public safety, public order, security and stability of the sovereign state of the Fiji Islands." '

On arrival in Sydney Hunter told a press conference: "The trouble is there is no law in Fiji, the law is what certain people say it is on any given day, and if you don't like it, then you can argue that at length," he said.

"It's leading to chaos, it's leading to economic chaos, the Fiji economy is in a shocking mess.....it is difficult to see where the end of it is."

Two editors of the Fiji Times were also deported fom Fiji over previous run-ins with the Bainimarama regime, one in 2008, and the other in 2009.

Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith has condemned the latest media crackdown implemented by Bainimarama.

“We worry very much that this arbitrary move sends a very bad signal as far as future investment in Fiji is concerned, let alone the very bad signal it sends in terms of freedom of expression, freedom of speech, and democratic rights,” Smith said Tuesday.

Former prime minister Sitiveni Rabuka, who led the first coup in 1987, but was democratically elected in 1992, said Tuesday the Fiji Times had been very critical of his own leadership, but that the newspaper had "served Fiji very well" for more than a century. "It has been a pioneering and strong newspaper," he said.

News Limited CEO and Chairman John Hartigan said the decree further eroded the "basic tenets of democracy" in Fiji. News Limited is the Australian arm of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, and is the owner of the Fiji Times, which it has owned and operated for 23 years.

"This illegal government has retrospectively withdrawn permission for foreign media investment in Fiji, which is not only grossly unfair but will inevitably be enormously damaging to Fiji's reputation as an attractive investment opportunity," Mr Hartigan said.

Speaking to the national Australian newspaper, The Australian, he said it would be unlilkely that a prospective buyer for the newspaper, which employs 180 journalists and up to 1,000 people indirectly, would be found in the face of the "draconian restrictions."

"One of two things is likely to result from this, closure of the Fiji Times or a takeover by a compliant new party by the end of September," Mr Hartigan said. "Regardless, either of these scenarios means a voice of democracy that has campaigned tirelessly on behalf of the people may be silenced."

Mr Hartigan also took aim at the Australian government for not doing enough to get Bainimarama to hold elections.

"For its part, the Australian government has brought little pressure to bear on the military government to hold elections, restore democracy or re-establish the depleted power of Fiji's judiciary, outside of travel bans on regime leaders and their families," he said.

New Zealand Media Freedom Committee secretary Tim Pankhurst said the measures were part of a disturbing trend towards dictatorship, and another reason New Zealanders should boycott travelling to Fiji.

"I believe that individuals should take action against them (Fiji's military regime) by not holidaying in Fiji," Mr Pankhurst told NZPA.

Smith and Key Condemns Fiji Press Crackdown

ABC News - 30 June 2010

Foreign Affairs Minister Stephen Smith has condemned a decision by Fiji's military-backed government to ban foreign ownership of the media.

News Limited has owned and operated the Fiji Times for 23 years, but the military government has now ruled that media organisations must be 90 per cent locally owned.

News Limited has now been given just three months to sell the Fiji Times or see it forced to close.

Mr Smith says it is another example of Commodore Frank Bainimarama's interim government attacking free speech and democracy.

"We worry very much that this arbitrary move sends a very bad signal as far as future investment in Fiji is concerned, let alone the very bad signal it sends in terms of freedom of expression, freedom of speech, and democratic rights," he said.

New Zealand agrees the move goes too far.

New Zealand prime minister John Key described the Fijian decree as "very heavy-handed".

He says when a country starts banning the media and telling organisations to sell their newspapers, it is "a step too far".

News Limited has expressed outrage at the decree, which was gazetted on Monday by the military-backed interim regime.

The final decree, as highlighted in a draft released earlier this year, will create a media authority and tribunal based on a model used to manage the media in Singapore.

It will also limit foreign ownership of media operations to just 10 per cent.

On its website, the Fiji Times quoted the head of the attorney-general's office, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, as saying that all directors and at least 90 per cent of shareholders of media organisations in Fiji must be citizens of the nation.

"I wish to make it clear that any media organisation which fails to comply with this requirement shall cease to operate as a media organisation, and shall also be liable for an offence under the decree," the Fiji Times quoted Mr Sayed-Khaiyum as saying.

"At this stage, Fiji Times is the media organisation that needs to comply with the ownership requirements."

News Limited chairman John Hartigan says the the jobs of nearly 200 Fiji Times staff and nearly 1,000 others involved in selling the newspaper are now at risk.

The company's corporate affairs director Greg Baxter says the latest move is an an attack on free speech.

But Fiji's interim attorney-general has rejected the criticism, saying it is in Fiji's interests to have have its media owned by Fijians.

News Limited will now explore any options it may have to remain involved in media in Fiji.

Fiji’s Repressive Media Decree Takes Effect





New York, June 28, 2010

—A new Fijian media decree that formalizes repressive government control of the media could force the outspoken Fiji Times to close within three months, according to international news reports.



Fiji Attorney General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum announced at a press conference today that the Media Industry Development Decree, drafted in April, is now in effect, according to local and international news reports. The decree requires all media outlet directors and 90 percent of shareholders to be citizens and permanent residents of Fiji. Sayed-Khaiyum set a deadline three months from today for media organizations to comply or cease to operate, the news reports said.



The clause targets the Times, which has been owned for 23 years by News Ltd., the Australian arm of Rupert Murdoch’s New York-based News Corp., according to international news reports. “At this stage Fiji Times is the media organization that needs to comply with the ownership requirements,” Sayed-Khaiyum said during the press conference, according to a report on the Times’ Web site.



The decree’s other measures forbid news broadcasts “against the national interest or public order” and reporting without a byline, with a government-appointed tribunal to adjudicate complaints, the reports said. Penalties for noncompliance have been reduced since the April draft, but still include hefty fines and potential jail terms, according to the reports.



Military leader Frank Bainimarama banned reporting critical of the government under emergency regulations in April 2009 after a court ruled his 2006 coup unlawful. The Fiji Times was among many media outlets to question Bainimarama’s failure to meet his pledge to restore democracy by 2009. Sayed-Khaiyum said today that censorship would continue for the next three months, according to the Times.



“Frank Bainimarama’s government must repeal this decree and cease restricting news content,” said CPJ Executive Director Joel Simon. “Bainimarama took power promising a return to democracy, but his actions are increasingly dictatorial.”



News Ltd.’s Australian office did not answer calls and e-mails after local business hours today. John Hartigan, News Ltd. chairman and chief executive, said in a statement there was “no doubt that this move is designed to force our hand in selling the business and pulling out of Fiji,” according to The Associated Press.



The Fiji Times, the country’s oldest newspaper, has come under increasing pressure in the past few years, with at least two senior Australian staff members deported after officials questioned their work permits, according to CPJ research.



The April draft threatened publishers, editors, and journalists with fines of 100,000 Fiji dollars (US$50,000) and five-year jail terms for breaching the decree, according to an AP report in April. That has been revised to 25,000 Fiji dollars (US$13,000) or two years in prison, according to Agence France-Presse. Media organizations still face up to 100,000 Fiji dollar (US$50,000) penalties.

http://cpj.org/2010/06/fijis-repressive-media-decree-takes-effect.php


Comments posted on Matavuvale.com

  • The illegal Regime in Fiji is now showing its true colors to us the people they are supposedly governing. It has been 4 long years since the take over and the only success story they can claim is the
    going south of the economy,the total isolation of the illegal govt of Fiji from the International community and the wasted human resources by the militarization of the civil service.
    The economic indicators do not lie nor does International statistics in stating that Fiji economy is almost at total collapse if it has not reached that point already.
    The illegal PM boasts about the entry of Fiji to the Non Alaigned Movement but he does not know the remification of such actions.
    Borrowing money and asking for loan is now the hallmark of this illegal regime.
    To everyone who reads this blog in Fiji, please know that your FNPF is being used by this illegal regime to suppoet them and that is why you the taxpayers of Fiji do not have excess to your FNPF when you want it.
    Now let us look very closely at the countries that Bainimarama is seeking detante and close ties with,
    The Arab world is the norm for the illegal regime now because Khaiyum is trying to Talibanize Fiji and all you people in Fiji are just standing by and watch Bainimarama take your country to the dumpsters.
    The Education system in Fiji today leaves a lot to be desired because the school's infrastructure is in dire need to upgrading and there is a great need for qualified experienced teachers to be employed but the 55 year work limit has brought the education standards in Fiji down.
    The Turn North Policy is very dangerous because as soft loans mounts so does the liability for our grandchildren and great grandchildren's future look slim and debt ridden and it will take them for ever to pay these soft loans off.
    One of the hallmaek of tyhis illegal regime is the employment of relatives and people who have very little or no educational background. When you have the uneducated trying to lead the educated it is a recipe for disaster.
    It is now time for all of the Fiji people to stand up to this illegal regime and stop them now before it is too late.
  • And not forgetting, OB Loru, the additional $20million loan from Fijian Holdings Ltd., and addtional loans from other sources to pay civil servant salaries.

    Surely the illegal regime is going bankrupt. All that Sada Reddy is saying about the upturn in the economy is seemingly untrue.
  • Sai even the United States of America has got wind of this Media decree.The New York Times is owned by Rupert Murdoch.Now a non en tity like Fiji? Wait when the world media will clamp down on Khaiyum.
  • The Suppression of the Media have been the hallmarks of many Muslims countries and not because its a Muslim country its because the leaders sees it as away to rule with fear and the suppression of the voice of truth.This is the same here in Fiji.

    Now the Khaiyyum is the VIP of this Illegal Government, he is thriving on this Decrees, not as so much as Frank and the Indeginous Fijian. The country if Frank does not wake up soon, khaiyyum would be last person standing up, since all decrees is isolating Frank from everyone else in Fiji.

    Those who are backing Frank only exist because of the paycheque. Try stopping the Pay cheque, Frank. and you will see how many real friends you have among the Fijians and our brothers the Indians know where their bread is buttered. On Marshlows Hierachy of needs, for Fijians food is important, you stop the source , you get chaos and kocokoco.

    I am somewhat mystified when we see the Government coffers graphs going into red, the Illegal Government in bed with China, Russia, the insignificant Arabian countries, we still think that this person has the mental to drive across the huge wilderness which He did not realise He created himself. Guess what he is borrowing Money from FHL- whose architect he removed with the gun barrel.

    On modern day economicsthe SDL knows exactly what it was doing. Because though their spin seem somewhat made vague by Chaudhary to the Commodore and when Chaudhary realise that Commodre was on ball, he rolled with it, gave Commodore the lollipop of this century and opted out,waiting to get back into the 2014 election.

    Khaiyyyum takes his cue from Chaudhary. Frank is a pawn in all this. "Frank you take the money, we will write the laws"- Khaiyyam&Chaudhary

    Fiji the land of my birth. Man up and stand up to be counted!

    PS. Frank thought he was using them as pawns, but its the other way round. True to that adage " There are no angels in hell"

Fiji Media Decree Entrenches Regime’s Control

Posted by Pacific in the Media - June 30, 2010




The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has condemned the new media decree imposed by the military regime as erasing the right of journalists to report freely and fairly.




The Media Industry Development Decree 2010, which the administration announced yesterday had been gazetted on June 25, permanently installs the sweeping censorship that has been in force in Fiji since “temporary” emergency regulations were imposed in April 2009.



The decree is little changed from a draft that met with international condemnation when it was announced in April.



“The Bainimarama regime claims it has revised many elements of its draft decree after a sham public consultation. But the decree now made law erases the rights of journalists’ and the media to report in the public interest,” IFJ General Secretary Aidan White said.



“Fiji’s power-holders need to step back from this coercive and ultimately destructive law, and initiate moves to a cooperative independent regulatory system that is supported by local media and recognised by the international community.”



The law provides for two government-appointed bodies. A Media Tribunal will comprise one member appointed by the President. A Media Industry Development Authority will have six members appointed by the Minister for Information.



Under the law, the regime and its authorities will decide what is fair, balanced and quality journalism. They will “ensure that nothing is included in the content of any media service which is against public interest or order, or national interest, or which offends against good taste or decency and creates communal discord”.



The IFJ fears for journalists and media organisations, which can be fined and jailed if the tribunal rules that news reports breach the regime’s media codes, including its Media Code of Ethics and Practice.





Media organisations face fines of $100,000 Fiji dollars (about USD 50,600), publishers or editors $25,000 (about USD 12,600) and journalists or other employees of media organisations $1000 (about USD 500).



The tribunal may also order compensation of up to $100,000 Fiji dollars (about USD 50,600) be paid by media organisations to “any person aggrieved or adversely affected” by media reports.



The tribunal can order media organisations and their employees to disclose sources. If they do not, they can be fined $10,000 (about USD 5060) or jailed for up to two years, or both.



The law retrospectively requires that all media organisations be registered with the authority and 90 per cent owned by citizens of Fiji.



"This action clearly targets the Fiji Times, which is owned by News Ltd.The paper, which has a staff of about 200, is the only local media outlet to try to maintain critical independence despite attacks, threats, intimidation and more than a year of strict censorship."



The right of appeal against tribunal decisions is only available where a penalty or compensation payment of $50,000 Fiji dollars (about USD 25,300) has been ordered.



“Journalists and other media workers could lose their jobs as a result, but it is the people of Fiji who will suffer the most from the blackout on independent critical voices,” White said.

Illegal Fiji Regime Defends Repressive Laws to Jail Journos

by Michael McKenna

The Australian June 30, 2010

THE media regulator for Fiji's military regime has defended laws that will jail journalists and slash foreign investment.
The military claims the laws are necessary after years of "abusive and scurrilous" reporting about the coup and the scrapping of the Pacific nation's constitution.

Former Canberra-based academic Satendra Nandan, chairman of the Media Industry Development Authority, said action needed to be taken against outlets such as The Fiji Times, which had taken a "strong stand" against Fijian dictator Frank Bainimarama, who took power in 2006.

The new laws impose fines and jail terms of two years for journalists and editors, and orders that all media outlets must be 90 per cent owned by Fijian citizens who live permanently in the island nation.

Foreign Minister Stephen Smith and the International Federation of Journalists were yesterday among those condemning the new laws, which became effective on Monday.

The Fiji Times -- one of the oldest newspapers in the Asia-Pacific region -- is wholly owned by News Limited, publisher of The Australian, and has three months to comply with the decree or be closed down. It has its own board, which includes several Fijian nationals as directors.

Professor Nandan told The Australian he believed the foreign ownership laws were directed at The Fiji Times because of its coverage of the military regime, particularly after the scrapping of the judiciary and constitution last year. "The Fiji Times is an institution, a part of everyday life here, and has a number of very fine journalists," he said.

"We had a media that was vibrant and vigilant until things went wrong in 2006 (the coup) and then some parts of the media became abusive and scurrilous.

"The Fiji Times took a strong stand against the current government and the abrogation of the constitution and they didn't consider the national interest."

The Dean of Humanities at the University of Fiji, Professor Nandan was appointed to the role with the government announcing that was a "trained journalist".

He conceded yesterday that his training was limited to "about nine months" working as a reporter and sub-editor for The Statesman newspaper, in India, in the 1960s.

News Limited last night declined to comment on its intentions with The Fiji Times.

Mr Smith said the new laws were another example of Commodore Bainimarama's interim government attacking free speech and democracy. 

"We worry very much that this arbitrary move sends a very bad signal as far as future investment in Fiji is concerned, let alone the very bad signal it sends in terms of freedom of expression, freedom of speech, and democratic rights."

Cross Media Ownership and Cross Cabinet Positions: Spot the Hypocrites

Posted by Pacific in the Media- 30 June 2010





Under the illegal and obnoxious Media Decree, Cross Media Ownership is where a person of a certain medium is limited in the amount of shares they can hold in other mediums or of the same medium.



Section 39 sub-section 4 of the decree states that no person may act as a director in more than one media organisation and they have been given 12 months to comply with the cross ownership requirements in the Media Decree.



And yet see below the cross-Cabinet positions the coupists are holding since the 2006 coup:




Frank Bainimarama:

Prime Minister and Minister for Public Service; People's Charter for Change; Minister for Information and Archives; Minister for Finance and National Planning and Sugar; Minister for Provincial Development, Indigenous and Multi-Ethnic Affairs. The dictator is also the Commander of the RFMF.



Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum:

Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Electoral Reform, Public Enterprises and Anti-Corruption, Industry, Tourism, Trade and Communication.





Filipe Bole

Minister for Education, National Heritage, Culture and Arts, Youth and Sports, Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment.



Epeli Ganilau

Minister for Defence, National Security and Immigration, and occasionally the un-elected acting Prime Minister





Inoke Kubuabola

Minister for Foreign Affairs, Civil Aviation and International Cooperation





Colonel Samuela Saumatua:

Minister for Local Government, Urban Development, Housing and Environment





Ms Sharon Smith-Johns:

In defending the media degree, the regime’s media propagandist pointed out similar legislations etc abroad. The difference is most legislations have come from governments who were given the democratic mandate to act and not through the barrel of the gun.





In any case, while Sharon-Smith Johns was busy defending the section on cross-media ownership in the decree, she herself was running around to other assignments, in her capacity as Acting Permanent Secretary for Information, National Archives and Library Services of Fiji.





What difference is there in her holding the various portfolios, which is closely related, and by those who equally have vested interests in cross-businesses?





Take the case of Mai Life Magazine, whose owners are now contemplating the future of their investment as the restrictions on cross media ownership in the new Media Industry Development Decree will have serious implications on the monthly magazine.





Richard Broadbridge said they have to study the decree before deciding their next step. However he said it would be a shame if Mai Life magazine is forced to close down. The Magazine is owned and operated by Richard Boardbridge and his wife Judith Ragg as Broadbridge is also the founder and the director of MaiTv.





Section 39 sub section 4 of the media decree states that no person may act as a director in more than one media organisation and they have been given 12 months to comply with the cross ownership requirements in the Media Decree.





We say to the Broadbriges; do not feel shameful, for it is those in the regime, especially Khaiyum and his un-elected Solicitor-General Christopher Pryde who should be shameful, and who should be fined and jailed for introducing the treasonous decree.





The difference between those having cross-ownerships is that they rightly deserve it whereas those holding cross-Cabinet positions have forcibly imposed themselves on the people of Fiji through the barrel of the gun.


Comments posted on Matavuvale.com

  • Suli and Freedom and Democracy Fiji Movement this is very clever.
    For any Organization Structure the Leadership and Management issues are the same. You have legitimacy in order to account to our customers, for the public good. The UIIMJR fail of this one.
    The differences between ownership and cabinet positions are in purpose, personality, performance and process. The UIIMJR fail on all these 4 Ps.
    The UIIMJR is disconnected and therefore wants to control something they don't have and as a result fear. And will never be able to control, because they are not trained for the new market Information Communication Technological Age, where the "carrot" is more effective that the "stick".
    Mere.
  • LAWA NI VAKAU I TUKUTUKU-Suliasi Daunitutu 

    Kemuni na wekaqu, sa mai siga rua oti na kena sa tekivu vakayagataki na lawa ka vauci ira na dau vakau i tukutuku, mai na vei niusiveva, retio, retio yaloyalo kei na veika e vauci ena cakacaka qo.

    Eda mai raica na kudru ni veimatanitu e veiyasai vuravura me baleta na kena laurai ni sogoti kina na nodra galala na dauvakau i tukutuku me ra vola se ripotetaka na veika e yaco tiko mai noda vanua ena gauna qo ka vakakina na gauna e matada. Qo e i vakaraitaki ni nodratou sa sogota ka kidomoka vakadua na noda galala na matanitu suguraki nei Bainimarama.

    Ia, ena veika sa mai yaco qo, sa mai laurai kina na nodratou sa sagata tikoga vakaukauwa na matanitu suguraki qo, me ratou vakarusa vakadua na veika eda vakamareqeta ka sa tiki tu mai ni noda bula na Kaiviti ena dua na gauna balavu sara. Au vosa tiko qo ena kena sa vakarau me mai sogo vakadua e dua na niusiveva ka a tekivu taba veva sara mai 1869 mai Levuka, ka curuma vata mai kei Viti na gauna ni Koloni, na nodra i lakolako mai na qirimiti na tu vakai koya me yacova na kena mai tamusuki na nodratou cakacaka vinaka mai vei iratou na matanitu qo.

    Kemuni na wekaqu, na niusiveva na Fiji Times esa tiki tu ni noda bula na Kaiviti me sivia e 140 na yabaki, sa rui ka bibi me da kila, ni kena mai sogoti e kauta vata mai e vuqa na ka.

    Matai, na kena yali e dua na noda tikini bula ni veisiga, karua na kena mai kau tani na nodra cakacaka e sivia e 500 na tamata, katolu na kena mai tamusuki e dua nai vurevure ni i lavo ka va na nodra na musuka na nodra via lako yani na tamata me ra laki vakaduri bisinisi ena noda vanua. E vuqa tale na ka e rawa ni yaco mai na kena sogo na Fiji Times, ka na lauti ira ga na lewe ni vanua na kena revurevu, sega ni’o ratou na veiliutaki tiko qo.

    Eda raica rawa i keri ni kena mai biu na lawa qo, e sega ni dua na ka vinaka e kauta mai vei Viti, na vakaloloma ga kei na kena tosoi cake na dravudravua. Na usutu levu ga ni lawa qo, sai koya na kena sagai me ratou kakua ni vakalewai na matanitu nei Voreqe, ka vakaraitaka votu vei keda na nodratou rerevaka na vosa vakadodonu kei na veivakalewai ka rawa ni ceuta mai ki macawa na nodratou duka ni veiliutaki. Oya nai tovo dina ni veivakalolomataki, veivakalaboci ka salavata na qaciqacia.

    Kevaka ko ni na qai wilika na lawa qo, o ni na raica, ni buli vakatabakidua me baleta na nodratou veiliutaki, ka sega ni baleta na kena sagai me vakavinakataki na ministiri ni vakau i tukutuku.

    Sa voleka ni vakarusai kece na veika eda nanuma tu ni tiki ni noda bula nai taukei, me tekivu mai na Lotu, na Bose Levu Vakaturaga, na Matanitu Digitaki, na dodonu ni lewe ni vanua, sa mai yaco qo ena vakau i tukutuku.

    Me’u tarogi kemuni mada, na cava ena tarava ? Eda na tu ga ka raica na kena vakavurumemeataki na noda i vakarau ni bula, i tovo, cakacaka, vuvale kei na nodra dodonu na luveda me ra bula galala me ra yacova na vanua e rawa ni kauti ira kina na veituberi vakavuli kei na nodra kila ka ? Se vinaka vei keda me da rai tu ka vakaveitaliataki na noda vanua ena so na vakatulewa yalowai, lecaika, ni lewe vica na tamata era saga na ka me nodra ga - se na nodra kocokoco na lewe vica.

    Na sogo ni niusiveva qo, e sa vakaraitaka na noda malumalumu ni taqomaka na veika e dodonu me da maroroya.

    Ke sa da sega ni lomana na Lotu, na Bose levu Vakaturaga, na noda cakacaka kei na veika eda vakamareqeta, au nanuma ni na sega ni dua e na rawa ni tu me vorata nai lakolako ni veivakalolomataki qo ni sa yacova yani na noda qele. Sai koya oya na vanua e sa mua tiko kina na veiliutaki qo, na kena volitaki vakadua na veika Vakaviti me ganita na nodra nanuma dukadukali na vica na tamata lolovira na nodra vakanananu.

    Ni kakua ni wele, baleta na veika ena yaco vei Viti, ena sega ni vinaka cake, ena toro sobu sara na kena vakaloloma ka da beitaki ga kina na lewena ni da laiva me yaco vei keda na veika kece qo.

    Vinaka, Suliasi Daunitutu
  • Suli and Friends,

    Au sega ni kila rawa se cava e nodra nanuma tiko na wekada mai Viti ena gauna 'qo, baleta na dredre ni bula e yacovi ira tiko ena vei siga. Eda rogoca na tubu ki lomalagi ni sau ni kakana, nai sulu kei na veika tale eso e vakayagataki ena vei siga.

    Na dredre ni bula era sotakaya na noda mai na veikorokoro, era na sega ni vakila na sotia mai Delainabua, baleta ni ra taura na kedra i sau levu ena gauna ni veisaumi, ka tudei tiko na nodra cakacaka kevaka era TAULO tiko ka tawamudu vua na dictator.

    Evei ena tini kina na veivakalolomataki 'qo? Ena tini ga kevaka era sega ni taleitaka na lewe ni vanua na nodra vakalolomataki. Na dididigi e nodra, na vakaloloma e nodra; ia na tarabi ni veika kece eda sotava tiko 'qo ena nodra na noda kawa mai muri.

    Sa tekivu tiko na noda volitaki na kawa i taukei - ka kena ulutagataka tiko na ulubale ni veivakatorocaketaki!