Saturday, May 30, 2009

Fiji Under Climate of Terror and Fear

Fiji in a climate of fear
May 30, 2009
Amnesty International has highlighted a climate of fear in Fiji, high levels of violence and impunity in Papua New Guinea and a growing health crisis from spreading slums in Solomon Islands. In its 2009 annual report, the human rights group condemns Fiji’s suspension of the constitution and legal processes and says its contributing to growing violence, impunity for police and soldiers, and a declining economy.

Fiji report
The human rights group says the interim, military-backed government of Fiji continued to violate freedom of expressions and use intimidation, particularly through a pattern of short-term arrests and deportations. Amnesty has called on China to use it’s influence to urge a restoration of legal processes in Fiji. Ms Guest says that with few signs Fiji cares about pressure from its neighbours and the Commonwealth, others should step in. “Of course China gives them quite a bit of aid and we feel this is very important and just generally China, now that it really is a world player it needs to start expressing some concern in some of these areas where it does have influence,” she said.
Posted by rawfijinews
Fiji : Amnesty calls for China’s step
May 30, 2009
The human rights group Amnesty International has called on China to use its influence to urge Fiji to restore legal processes. In its 2009 annual report, Amnesty says the interim military-backed government of Fiji continued to violate freedom of expression and use intimidation. This was particularly through a pattern of short-term arrests and deportations, Amnesty said. The report also criticises violence by police and says sexual violence against women and girls has increased.

Step in
Amnesty’s deputy director for the Asia Pacific region, Donna Guest, has told Radio Australia that with few signs Fiji cares about pressure from its neighbours and the Commonwealth, others should step in. “Of course, China gives them quite a bit of aid and we feel this is very important,” she says. “Just generally, China – now that it really is a world player – it needs to start expressing some concern in some of these areas where it does have influence.”
Posted by rawfijinews
Australia has withdrawn funding for a key position in Fiji’s elections office. The position of Supervisor of Elections has been made redundant following the cancellation of the constitution last month. The Australian Government formally notified Fiji’s Public Service Commission on May 13 that it has stopped salary supplementation support for the position. The Australian High Commission in Fiji says the government made the decision after Fiji’s President abrogated the 1997 Constitution and revoked all constitutionally appointed positions. This includes the supervisor’s role. The interim Fiji Government says elections will not be held until as late as 2014. Australia says it remains willing to provide considerable assistance with elections preparations in Fiji. But this is provided the Fiji Government is able to demonstrate a genuine commitment towards free and fair elections at an early date.
Posted by rawfijinews
One of the most revolting sights still etched on my mind was when a BBC cameraman re-played a tape to me following the 1987 coup of a overtly racist public prosecutor from the Director of Public Prosecutions Office, in full military gear, supporting the racist coup of Sitiveni Rabuka against the Indo-Fijians – he was none other than Isikeli Mataitoga. The tape was re-played to me as I was preparing to appear on the BBC’s prime time news channel to firmly and squarely condemn the 1987 coup and the racists behind it. Last night, I replayed the tape, and it made me cringe, as it did in 1987 – the sight of his Lordship Mataitoga. A double beneficiary of the 1987 and 2006 coups, he is now touted as one of two judges, the other being Nazhat Shameem, who will return to his old job next week.
We should not be surprised – the man has built his career out of the debris of the coup culture in Fiji – in 1987 he became the military spokesman of racism in Fiji, and after the 2006 went up to the Bench, making out as if he supported the bogus claim that the coup had been executed to weed out racism against the Indo-Fijians. Falsus in unus, falsus in omnibus is an ancient and commonly applied principle of law. If a witness is found to have testified falsely about one matter, it may be inferred that his testimony as to other matters, is false as well. So, bloggers, do not believe whatever explanation the man comes up with – he thrives on coups, illegality and now the absence of constitutionalism. But, now, that the 1997 Constitution is gone, Mataitoga’s own immunity for his role in the 1987 coups no longer stands – you see at the International Criminal Court one of these days – “Your Coupist Lordship”.
As to Nazhat Shameem, I will come back to her.
Posted by rawfijinews
It is beyond question that my name is, and will be eternally linked to, the Fiji SUN, the old one before the 1987 coups, and the new one which replaced it in name. As one searches for motives of newspaper editors and publishers in post-2006 coup, I went back to a copy of The Captive Press in the Third Reich by Oron J. Hale that was published in 1964. I had read it years ago, following the 1987 coups. I could not resist dusting it off my shelves to take a peek into history.
Hale was an American officer who had interviewed Adolf Hitler’s publisher and Nazi press magnate Max Amann in detention in Nuremberg, in September 1947, for Amann’s role in the Nazi party conquest of the German press. In his concluding remarks, Hale posed the question: what kind of profession and what kind of press did the system of total control produce? For a judgment and critique we need not go outside the circle of party leaders who were intimately concerned with the daily work of the press. William Weiss, who supported the system enthusiastically during the early years of the regime, was completely disillusioned. He had headed the Reich Press Association,Journalists and editors became increasingly dissatisfied and resentful of the government’s policy towards the press, he said. Likewise the monopoly gained by the party through Amann’s operations undermined the confidence of the public, although the full extent of his operation was not appreciated. Under the strict controls established by the Reich press chief and the propaganda ministry, editors and writers were deprived of all independence and initiative, and the newspaper became simply a megaphone. The public became uncertain and mistrustful of the press. Moreover, Weiss pointed out, a uniform press did not serve equally well all levels of education, interest, and attainment represented in the German population.
One paper was just the same as another and all were directed at a mass segment of the public.
People became bored and suspicious and the press as a source of information and opinion lost its standing and influence. And even Amann, when asked if he thought the party’s monopoly of newspaper published produced a good daily press, admitted that although he had given it a good economic foundation, “it was impossible to edit and publish good newspapers”.
The editors, he said, complained to him that they received a three-inch file of directives and a one-inch file of news. “How could an editor publish a good paper when he sat with one foot in jail and the other in the editorial room?” Indeed, how could he? Unless, you become a shameless propagandist of the dictatorial regime, cowing to censors who have spent their lives churning out third quality government press releases, and who had nothing by envy of the mainstream journalists who risked it all to tell their countrymen what had been really happening to their beloved country. The journalists and editors who have not sold their soul to the regime should take comfort from Frankfurter Zeitung, which had been founded in 1856 but was closed down by Hitler in 1943. While in the end the Nazi dictator was forced to commit suicide in his bunker in Berlin, the Frankfurter Zeitung was re-launched in 1946. Its time pro-regime megaphone media editors took a leaf out of history- that dictatorial regimes will in the end die, but fearless journalism will live on.
Posted by rawfijinews
There are talks in Fiji that two more judges will take their treasonous oath next week. Isikeli Mataitoga and Nazhat Shameem are rumoured to have said yes to Aiyaz Khaiyum’s pleas to join their deadly 1997 Fiji Constitution assasins.
Posted by rawfijinews
Fiji’s junta judges
May 29, 2009
Article from: The Australian
FEAR and loathing are reaching impressive new heights in Fiji after the most recent manoeuvres by that country’s dictatorship. By stripping the Fiji Law Society of the right to issue practising certificates, the military government has all the tools it needs to embark on a purge of that country’s lawyers. From the perspective of military strongman Frank Bainimarama, such a move would have a nice touch of symmetry. The stunning reappointment of Anthony Gates as the dictatorship’s chief justice indicates that it is quite prepared to engage in a purge of the judiciary. After sacking the entire judiciary, Bainimarama is now reappointing only those who are in the regime’s good books. So why wouldn’t the regime engage in a similar move against lawyers? Fiji is, after all, crawling with lawyers who are none too pleased about what the military is doing to their country. But before jumping to conclusions, it is worth focusing on the man who must take responsibility for these moves: attorney-general Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum.
Those who know him say he is unlikely to be attracted to such a blunt method of achieving his goals. He sees himself as a far more subtle operator. So instead of engaging in a purge, Sayed-Khaiyum might be hoping to achieve the same goal by other means. A credible threat of a purge might be all he needs in order to encourage Fiji’s lawyers to toe the line. In many ways, this would be even more insidious than a purge. If the regime’s goal is to intimidate the Law Society and its members, the heavy-handed weekend raid on the Law Society’s offices begins to make sense. With burglar alarms screaming, the regime’s foot soldiers entered the Law Society’s offices on Saturday and removed every complaint file they could find about Law Society members. The burglar alarms were entirely appropriate. While the attorney-general’s tactics are worth watching, the most startling move was by Gates. By signing on with the dictators last Friday, Gates has removed all doubt about where he stands and has played into the hands of his critics. You can almost hear the staff of the International Bar Association in London shaking their heads as they mumble “we told you so”. Gates featured prominently in an IBA report that had criticised the rule of law after the 2006 coup. That report, in turn, has itself been criticised. Before the events of April 10, when the constitution was abrogated, Gates and the other judges who took office after the 2006 coup could at least argue that they held office under the constitution. Their sacking in April prompted widespread sympathy and expressions of concern from the Australian Bar Association — an organisation that had previously warned of the risks of accepting judicial appointments in Fiji. Because of the unconstitutional actions of the regime between the 2006 coup that brought Bainimarama to power and April 10, that argument had a few difficulties. But after April 10, it’s impossible. What happened on Good Friday was not quite a coup, but it marked a major departure from the previous order. It presented Fiji’s judges with a choice and it’s revealing to see how they have responded.
Thomas Hickie, who was also criticised in the IBA report, was one of the three Court of Appeal judges who precipitated the Good Friday upheaval by ruling that the Bainimarama regime held office illegally. Hickie is back in Australia and will not accept office under the current arrangements. Before April 10 there were two types of judge in Fiji: those whose commissions pre-dated the 2006 coup and those who were disparagingly referred to by their critics as “junta judges”. After April 10, the debate about whether it was proper to take office after the 2006 coup has been overtaken by a much more clear-cut and important argument. Fiji’s judges still fall into two categories. But the dividing line is now April 10 and the divisions within the judiciary are much sharper. Those who swear to uphold the decrees of a dictator might be maintaining a form of order but that falls a long way short of the rule of law.
Posted by rawfijinews
IBA critises Fiji regime for raid on Law Society
May 29, 2009
The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute is raising concern at the Fiji military led regime’s recent raid and removal of confidential files from the Fiji Law Society offices. The seized files relate to complaints against Law Society members. The raid follows a decree, issued last week, that the Chief Registrar of the Court will take over the role of issuing lawyers’ practising certificates from the Law Society. All certificates issued by the Law Society will become invalid from the end of next month. The IBA’s executive director, Mark Ellis, says this gross invasion of the rule of law takes Fiji another step away from an independent legal profession. He says since the 2006 coup, repeated actions by the interim government have caused the deterioration of the rule of law in the country, and the latest decree may be the death knell to an independent legal profession.
News Content © Radio New Zealand InternationalPO Box 123, Wellington, New Zealand
Posted by rawfijinews
Dictator Frank Bainimarama continues to spew his bull dung to the international community
May 28, 2009
Intervention on Agenda Item 6 (ACP/26/031/09 REV 1) on the Committee of Ambassadors Report by dictator Bainimarama
Mr. President, allow me on behalf of my delegation to congratulate your Excellency on your appointment to the Chair and to assure you of Fiji’s co-operation. Allow me if you will Mr. President to provide a brief on the political situation in Fiji as referred to in paragraphs 28 and 29 of the Committee of Ambassadors Report before us.

Update ACP Council on the Political Situation in Fiji
Court of Appeal RulingColleagues and Excellencies, you are no doubt aware that on the afternoon of Thursday 9th April in a legal action by the former Prime Minister challenging the validity of the President’s powers to appoint an Interim Government, the 3 member Fiji Court of Appeal ruled that:
1. The 1997 Constitution did not give the President express written powers to appoint an Interim Government;
2. Suggested that the President should exercise his discretion and appoint a caretaker PM, an independent person who is neither a party or a defendant in the Court case;
3. Refused the State’s application for a Stay Order on the grounds of appeal to the Supreme Court.

It was noticeable that Voreqe's body language on those around him?? Do they look excited or convinced by his babbles? Hmmm…..they look bored shit with everyone kinda looking around the room while Frank spills his dung.

On the afternoon of the same day, soon after the Court of Appeal’s ruling, I consulted my Cabinet and informed the President that the Interim Government has stepped down. President’s ResponseAfter taking legal advice overnight, the President in a televised address to the nation on 10th April declared that the Court of Appeal’s ruling has left him with very limited options because the suggestion by the Court of Appeal above was also not provided for in the Constitution and this anomaly in the decision, coupled with the serious consequent vacuum created by that decision; and the existing circumstances in Fiji left His Excellency no choice but to abrogate the 1997 Constitution.
And to avoid a prolonged situation where in practical legal terms Fiji had been left without a Government for the preceding 24 hours, the President declared the abrogation of the Constitution and reappointed my team of Ministers as an Interim Government to prepare the country for a return to sustainable democratic governance with all the relevance constitutional and electoral reforms to be addressed.
The abrogation of the Constitution by the President was considered necessary in the difficult legal situation Fiji was faced with on 9th April and it had allowed the President through the previous Interim Government to continue with the reforms that he had embarked on and which was supported by a majority of Fiji’s population [in a nationwide consultation in 2008] and was encapsulated as a credible way forward in the People’s Charter for Change, Peace and Progress.
New Legal OrderUnder this new Legal Order the President has decreed his appointment as Head of State and the re-appointment of myself as the Prime Minister, and those who served previously to the same post in the new Cabinet. The President in our meeting on 10th April wanted continuity and the reform agenda to be fast tracked, including the convening of the general election by not later than September 2014.
The Government has resurrected by decree the essential elements of the abrogated Constitution that deals with law and order, the Judiciary and other Constitutional Offices. Law & OrderThe situation remains calm around the country but the Government has issued a Public Emergency Regulations (PER), to safeguard against any illegal or subversive activities and also to ensure the smooth running of the machinery of Government. This PER will be reviewed at the end of the month.
New Administration’s Mandate
My Administration after being sworn in by the President on 10TH April, has recommitted ourselves to overseeing constitutional and electoral reforms for a better Fiji, particularly the formulation of an electoral system that is based on universal and equal suffrage. And in light of the above, I wish to request the support of the Council in the essential constitutional and electoral reform that my Government wishes to carryout in Fiji for the betterment of all her population.
I thank you Sir.
Posted by rawfijinews
Amnesty International has condemned the recent raid of the Fiji Law Society and the removal of confidential files by the newly appointed Chief Registrar of the High Court, former army legal advisor Major Ana Rokomokoti. Amnesty says it is totally unacceptable to impose rules which effectively prohibit lawyers from practising unless licensed by the illegal military government of Commodore Frank Bainimarama. It says since the coup of December 2006, the military led government has consistently attacked the independence of the judiciary. Furthermore, it says the continued harassment and intimidation of lawyers must cease immediately. Amnesty welcomes the New Zealand Law Society’s statement that it will monitor the situation. But Amnesty International says it believes the current situation will only be resolved with the sustained pressure of the international community against the injustices which are taking place with alarming and systematic regularity.
News Content © Radio New Zealand InternationalPO Box 123, Wellington, New Zealand
Posted by rawfijinews
Immunity to Anthony Gates to Testify against Frank Bainimarama Anthony Gates your fate is pre-ordained; you know too much, you have seen too much and you have heard too much. The very hand that commands you will eventually betray you, just as he gave the order for his men to murder the former Director of Red Cross and his partner. Frank cannot be trusted and neither can you trust yourself. Franks phobia of going to jail for his heinous crimes will lead him to exterminate all those who are able to testify against him in a lawful independent impartial and fair criminal court including the ICJ. You will be granted immunity from prosecution if you testify against the Devil incarnate. You do not have much time, redeem your soul and tell the world the truth. For once in your life think of the people, you have the power to bring this tyranny to an end with your official complaint and testimony to ensure Franks International warrant of arrest. You can do it, catch a plane and leave now!
A blogger
Posted by rawfijinews
A modern day security myth is that Australia’s physical borders may not be compromised. This assumption rests on the premise that Australia do no share a physical barbed wire fenced boarder with any other autonomous State. Not true any more, for proven pandemic seepage of unwanted visitors masquerading in droves through the so called “treaty zone” for a very long time now. Though the Hawke era showed a bit of concern, no concerted effort made to discourage cross border migration on cultural and family connection, worse, opportunist from Iryana Jaya and possibly others, are known to take advantage of this goodwill of the “Treaty Zone’, hence, a burden to the already pathetic health system in Queensland etc. Look, Mr. Bainimarama’s threat that his IG is sleeping with China and other Asian bad girls does not seem to be heeded by big boy Australia and small brother NZ. In Canberra, it is business as usual as Chinese Government owned mega Corporations are as we speak builds Aussie based Coal and later uranium plants etc, with one signed just yesterday with Queensland wealthiest Dude. Just that Fiji present regime has not won Chinas heart yet, may never will, cause Australia pays to bed China and both are laughing to the bank while we wallow in our misery like a “kisi lusi”..tsh…tsh..tsh…
Australian Defense minister Joel Fitzgibbon loves Chinese food well before he become Minister with those Beijing trips paid by wealthy Chinese lady..eh..yeah..and Mr. Rudd knows the Chinese lingo front to back, right to left. Fiji may not even mentioned at all in the security paper, but vaguely put at the security back burner as a relatively “pressing concerns”, not threat, that could wait, may be for years, and as other “Melanesian countries” that burps some “pretty negative” hot air every so often. May be Australia sees us more like a rouge territory of her own..well..with continued devaluation of our dollar we might soon be trading in the more credible Aussie currency in the streets of Suva and fish market in Nabouwalu etc.
semi meo
Posted by rawfijinews
President’s Political Dialogue Forum coordinator Jone Dakuvula must think we, the people of Fiji, will believe anything we’re told. The fundamental principle about putting out a line for public consumption, a principle which Dakuvula clearly doesn’t understand, is that what ever is being stated needs to at least sound credible. So, pretending that Fiji is not a dictatorship and that political reform will go ahead without the main political players at the table is not going to wash with anyone. But that’s obviously not what Dakuvula thinks. Or is it? Quite frankly, his talk about the regime’s correspondence with the United Nations and the Commonwealth is pure nonsense. We suspect he fully realizes that participation by either or both of those international bodies in any sort of mediation role would be strictly conditional on all the main players in Fiji having a role. But we know (and Dakuvula knows) that his boss, the dictator, will not allow that to happen, which is why Dakuvula’s feeble attempt to make it look as though some serious work is going on falls flat on its face. Like Dakuvula himself, his clumsy efforts at diplomacy are a joke.
fijidemocracynow2009
Posted by rawfijinews

Fiji junta resolute in wiping out media freedom
May 28, 2009
Fijilive.com has shown no signs of life today.
Earlier this morning, we broke the news after receiving word from some of our well placed sources that fijilive.com has been assasinated by Fiji’s junta. Pictures provided by fijilive.com relating to the bomb scare in Fiji was linked to this blog via one of our earlier blog post. The pictures have since disappeared from that posting following the military gremlins’ clamp down on fijilive.com. Meanwhile, we have received word that the junta is pushing on its 24/7 TV channel with Fiji TV. It is understood that the junta will be paying Fiji TV a hefty amount of taxpayers stolen funds to finance the airing of their dictatorial propaganda.
Posted by rawfijinews

Police in Fiji have raided farms and found a marijuana crop with an estimated sale value of almost $US100 million. A police spokesman told Fiji media that 26 farms in the Navosa hills, on Viti Levu, were raided by the drugs unit. Officers discovered more than 15,000 plants. Eleven farmers are being questioned. It is the second major drug raid involving police and soldiers in Navosa this year.
http://www.radioaustralianews.net.au/story.htm?id=18167
Posted by rawfijinews
Australian military to focus on immediate neighbours
May 28, 2009
By Stephen de Tarczynski
MELBOURNE, May 28 (IPS)
– The Rudd government’s recently-released defence white paper outlines a substantial boost to the nation’s military capabilities and places a high priority on stability in neighbouring countries, including Indonesia and South Pacific states. After the principal task of defending Australia from direct attack, “our next most important strategic interest is the security, stability and cohesion of our immediate neighbourhood,” says the paper – specifically noting Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and East Timor. The white paper signals naval, air and special forces capabilities as areas for improvement over the next twenty years. The build-up to what the Kevin Rudd-led government calls ‘Force 2030’ will include additional submarines, destroyers and frigates for the navy, while the air force will receive around 100 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. Professor Ben Reilly, director of the Centre for Democratic Institutions at the Australian National University’s College of Asia and the Pacific, told IPS that the focus on Australia’s neighbours reflects contingency planning rather than pressing concerns. He says that the government’s philosophy is based on the concern that “our immediate neighbours could potentially become a threat to Australia – not so much from themselves, but if ever they were to be influenced by unfriendly powers.” One country which Australia has – in the past – perceived as a threat to its national security is Indonesia. The white paper states that, “it is in Australia’s vital strategic interests to see a stable and cohesive Indonesia.” However, bilateral relations have improved dramatically since 1999 when the issue of East Timor’s independence heightened tensions between Canberra and Jakarta. Australia welcomed Indonesia’s move toward democracy during the ‘reformasi’ period following the 1998 downfall of long-term dictator Suharto. The mainly Muslim nation is set to vote for its next president in July – with a run-off poll in September if required. Furthermore, the two nations signed a comprehensive partnership agreement in 2005 – committing to cooperation across economic, technical and security areas. There have also been moves to liberalise trade between the two neighbours, while Indonesia remains Australia’s largest aid recipient.
An indication of the burgeoning bilateral trust and cooperation is the provision of an advanced copy of Australia’s white paper to the Indonesian military, which was also consulted during the paper’s drafting process. Reilly argues that the transition to democracy in Indonesia has been a boon for Australia’s own security. “This has had huge strategic benefits to Australia because it has meant that we no longer have an authoritarian and potentially unpredictable – and, of course, a very large, populous – state next to us,” he says.
“Democracies are much more predictable in the way they operate because they have to be accountable to voters. It is extremely unusual in the world for two democracies to ever threaten or go to war with each other,” adds Reilly. Andrew Davies, director of the operations and capability programme at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute – an independent think-tank located in the nation’s capital – agrees that a stable Indonesia is vital to security in the immediate region.
He describes the white paper’s concentration on Australia’s neighbours as a “back-to-the-future” policy. It resurrects the “old ‘concentric circles’ model of Australian defence at a time when Australia has been involved in wars in the outer of those four circles – the global-interest type wars – since 2001,” Davies told IPS. The ‘concentric circles’ defence strategy projected a series of increasingly- larger circles around the northern city of Darwin – higher security interest was placed on areas lying within the inner circles – and was popular following Australia’s withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973. This strategy was largely abandoned under the previous government, which dedicated Australian forces to significant deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But, while the current government remains committed to efforts in Afghanistan, security in the broader Asia-Pacific region will take precedence over issues in far-off places. Central to this is the rise of China – now Australia’s largest trading partner – whose influence in the region is anticipated to increase as that of the United States, Australia’s most important ally for over six decades, diminishes. While Canberra enjoys good relations with Beijing, it has expressed concerns over human rights issues in China and remains wary of its extensive military modernisation.
In a speech at a security forum in Washington D.C. last month, Australian defence minister Joel Fitzgibbon stressed that, “Australia needs to have a healthy relationship with China.” The minister also spoke of Australia’s desire “to work in partnership with China because it is a critical player in ensuring stability in our region.” But while the white paper also places high value on a stable and cohesive Southeast Asia – “our neighbours in Southeast Asia sit astride our northern approaches, through which any hostile forces would have to operate to sustainably project force against Australia,” says the paper – stability closer to Australian shores is given greater prominence.
The paper warns that, “many South Pacific island states and East Timor will continue to be beset to some degree by economic stagnation and social instability.” It points to factors such as weak governance – Australia remains highly critical of Fiji’s interim regime – crime, and climate change as reasons for which Australia must be prepared to provide humanitarian assistance or deploy military personnel in the future. “The development indicators in most of the small Melanesian countries – including East Timor – are all pretty negative. It would be prudent to, at least, plan for the possibility that we may have to conduct humanitarian or other interventions in some of those countries,” says Reilly.
Australia currently has some 650 defence personnel in East Timor to provide security after unrest broke-out in the fledgling country in 2006. There are also around 140 Australian Defence Force troops stationed in the Solomon Islands – in addition to police and civilian contributions – as part of the Australia-led Regional Assistance Mission to the Solomon Islands (RAMSI), whose aim is to maintain order in a country where ethnic violence erupted in 2003.
Posted by rawfijinews
You do not have to be rocket scientist either to be able to make fair and equitable performance-based reckonings on our former leaders. Depends really of the kinda barometer one uses to measure, whether it be morally, economic, political or just pure emotional presumptions. Sure varies based on personal experiences one encounters respectively with these former leaders or policies they respectivly mete out during their respective watch. Some from Eastern Fiji and a land unit in Central Eastern Viti Levu may still be fuming over Ratu Sir Sukuna’s decision not to afford their people the liberty to deal with their Native Land as other Land Owning Units in other Provinces do and reap from lease monies. SM Koya in a name many Indo-Fijians prefer to forget, IJ Narayan is a name many Fiji born Indo-Fijian loathes, Judge JR Reddy, while revered by many Fijians for his historic BLV speech is hated by many Indo-Fijian for “selling” them out. The four Chiefs Ratu Sirs?…well…the mention of one or all these honourable Chiefs name may send shives up the spine of land owners of Hydro, Pine, Sugar cane, Marine reclamation, municipal acquisitions, Airports, Provincial Corporation, Copra subsidies etc after committing long terms leases of a mere 15 measly cents an acre in the name of Vanua solidarity while overseas contractor/suncontartors milked millions and busted national budget to twice the project costs during these Chiefs watch.
Others like so called patriot PM Rabuka who may have been cajoled to commit the Coup crime only after the Fijian were shocked that political dominance lost and their fear by few Indo-Fijians who were milking the Alliance cow under the very nose of the four Ratu Sirs. Sam Speight senior will tell the depth his son George true involvement as the fall guy for some who backed out on the eleventh hour pre 2000 coup. Ratu J Seniloli and Ratu K Vakalalabure were just Lieutenants who may have just jumped with good intent to salvage the situation post Coup 2000, hence, accessory to the fact.
Uncle Chaudhry is a class of his own. He hates and was a victim of another Coup, yet, loves and overwhelming Loves another, only now he wanna file for divorce from his marriage to the Bainiamara/Ganilau/Chaudhry pre 2006 Coup dating game and Post Coup political romp.
That said, it would be unfair to list African thugs and self appointed Bishop Field Marshal Mugabe and Hajji sir Amin Dada with any of our people, Bainimarama included. These two are proven killers, mass murderers.
The Fiji Dictator now rates just below these African killers, but definitely, not equal to these two disciples and sons of Satan. We all hope he does NOT crave for promotion to that evil league.
..mmm…scanning the ratings, we could only see that out all these Leaders, only one have been humble enough to publicly admit, publicly confessed, publicly apologise and publicly sought forgiveness and may have been found resitution in the hearts of many in Fiji and abroad…yep.. only SLR, not the Ratu Sir SLR but the kid from Drekeniwai. Shouldn’t the present Fiji Dictator now board the HMS Humility or he’s make up his mind to stay on board HMS NO TURN BACK whose only imminent and sure destination are the reefs of Nasilai…mmm…very close to the $30 Island of Nukulau.
semi meo
Posted by rawfijinews
This is the Fiji TV One news report ok’ed by the junta to be beamed to the Fijian masses but they did not allow fijilive.com pictures of the same incident on the internet. Why you may wonder? It’s part of the mind control game by Fiji’s junta on its people.

Bomb threats cause disruption
Fiji TV One News – 26 May 2009
Several shops in the capital city have been cleared by the authorities after business had to be halted and traffic diverted earlier this afternoon. The disruption to business and traffic – both vehicle and pedestrian – followed a report of an anonymous bomb threat call. Police confirm Jacks in Suva and Courts Homecentres in Samabula and businesses along Rodwell road were closed at 1pm. Roads in the affected arears were cordoned off by the authorities. Police, the National Fire Authority, St Johns Ambulance, and the military bomb squad were dispatched to the sites. They’ve been given the all clear … as investigations continue.
Check it out here http://www.fijitv.com.fj
Will team Frank take fijitv.com.fj off line now?

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Military Paranoid over Bloggers & Anti Regime Blogs

By Basuraki Bainimarama
The personnels working in the Military Media Cell are being used to respond to critics of the IG on all websites and blogsites to show that the people of Fiji support the current status quo. These recently recruited junior military officers are being paid by tax payers money to heap praises for the IG and oppose all those who go against them by purporting that they are living aboard when in cyber. The latest count is 150 military personnels who are on a 24hour shift sitting infront of the computer. No wonder computers are being confisicated all over the place. Interestingly these Officers resort to watching online ponography when they get bored. What Chiko Mada!
Posted by rawfijinews
Australian and New Zealand investors in Fiji have been labelled naive by Fiji-born New Zealand businessman, Ballu Khan. Mr Khan was previously accused of masterminding an assassination plot against Commodore Frank Bainimarama, but the charges were dropped. He says the changes being introduced by the regime in Fiji do not just affect Suva, but everyone in the whole country. Mr Khan believes that involves investors, including those developing resorts or running hotels: “The real test is, all these people, investors in the tourism industry, will come when they are one the rough end of the stick and there are no institutions for them to run to it will be based on somebody’s judgement. I think it is completely naive of them.” Mr Khan says the regime is destroying the fundamental and core institutions of Fiji.
News Content © Radio New Zealand InternationalPO Box 123, Wellington, New Zealand
Posted by rawfijinews
There are fears that the quality of the legal profession in Fiji will be damaged as a result of the move to transfer the issuing of practising certificates away from the Law Society. Under the Presidential decree new certificates have to be applied for in just over two week’s time. But Fiji-born New Zealand businessman, Ballu Khan, says he believes many lawyers won’t apply out of principle. Mr Khan was accused of masterminding an assassination plot against Commodore Frank Bainimarama, but the charges were dropped. He says the licensing change could put a large number of high quality lawyers out of the system and degrade quality of the legal fraternity. “Lawyers who get licensed by the current regime will always be compromised in the manner which they represent and advocate on behalf of their clients in the courts and we’ve got some nasty scenarios coming out; if a lawyer is defending a case against the regime and is licensed by the regime, is he really able to criticise the regime in a court of law?” Mr Khan says the delays in hearings after the sacking of the judiciary and the slowdown in the economy have also left many legal firms struggling.
News Content © Radio New Zealand InternationalPO Box 123, Wellington, New Zealand
Posted by rawfijinews
Frank Bainimarama and Teleni’s arms manufacturing dream emerging
May 26, 2009
The manufacture of lethal weapons, as well as chemical, biological and radioactive propelled missiles are the order of the day in Fiji with all necessary licenses and permits awaiting hush hush approval by Frank and Teletubby. Where in the world raw materials are to be sourced from and to whom the manufactured arsenal would be sold to is anyone’s guess, even in defiance with International conventions ratified by Fiji. The key problem with this so called foreign investment is that all resources will be imported including the human element and we will be giving them a tax free factory holiday. Stay tuned for more as we expose the desperation of a tin pot commander and his teletubby partner in crime whose action will crate a new dimension to the concept of security and foreign relations in the Pacific. This is the price of allowing a rouge failed state to endure…
buddha747
Posted by rawfijinews
Fijians are scared to be seen looking at the internet in case they are thought to be reading anti-government blog sites, says a blogger in the Pacific nation. Yet internet blogs have become a popular source of information in Fiji after the interim government imposed media censorship laws on the country’s mainstream media outlets. The blogger – who insists on anonymity – told Radio Australia’s Pacific Beat program that it is not just bloggers themselves who are careful about being identified by the government, but blog readers as well. He says feedback from readers indicates that many people in Fiji are worried about simply being observed at a computer accessing the internet. “One of the comments that’s interesting is that some has said to me, ‘keep it short, we’re going in to read your blog in particular during work times and we can’t be seen to be surfing the net.” The reader had continued: “We wan’t to get information in the quickest way possible, in an easy way to digest.” The blogger says people who read the blogs should be cautious after some lawyers were outed as anti-government bloggers and were taken in for questioning last week. “(The government) are certainly, I think, very interested in who is doing what and where the information is coming from and certainly what their sources are.
“And we saw that with the two lawyers, they have been targeted and their material have been confiscated that there is cause that there is something to be able to do our work,” Australian internet security specialist, Patrick Gray, says while it is possible for governments to track people online there are some ways Fijians can safely browse the internet. Mr Gray says there are some software tools on the internet which might help blog readers in Fiji avoid detection.
Posted by rawfijinews
Dear RFN a few more members are coming forth and want to be heard:
Member 1,Major and above, our NCOs have BRAIN WASHED and instructed the boys to turn their guns on whoever gives the order to shoot innocent civilians within squads when the time comes. Instruction ” vagoleya ga vei koya e solia mai na ota… kua tale ni qai raica na yaloka ni matana se na tabana, tabaka ga.. na gasau e na qai cakacaka taki koya” To the Methodist Church you are the only hope for the future generations, we have had enough EVIL in our MIDST.
Dictators will never honour their word.
An example that they teach at Military College
” O HITLER kei STALIN they signed a non-aggression pact(contract) before the beginning of WORLD WAR II. A few moons later 21,000,000 Soviets perished and 9 ,000,000 Germans perished.” These are dictators , they don’t honour their words and they don’t care about other people and BLOOD on their hands.
DIALOGUE WILL NEVER WORK.
Sa gauna me cakacaka taki na noda vabauta qo me vakataki NOA.
Sa gauna tu ni WALUVU ni CAKACAKA BUTBUTO tu i NODA VITI.
Its time to live our FAITH. O kemami na sotia ga vatamata, oi kemuni na sotia ni noda Kalou qaqa.
SA NODA GAUNA NA TAMATA YALODODONU. Me da ia ga vei JIOVA na vavinavinaka.
Sa nona gauna qo. Member 2,major and above, we would like to apologise to Mr Ballu Khan,Baleidrodroka, Siva,and everyone else that were falsely alleged to assainate IG and military personnel. As real military men and women of Fiji our heart goes out to your families for those dark moments.
1. We will make things right that we were suppose to do in 2007, we weren’t brave enough to stop it. But we ARE READY NOW.
2. After investigations to this sick concocted plot within the military, our apparatus have found out that it was basically TALL POPPY SYNDROME. The military plotters randomly picked successful individuals and people that pose a threat to the military.
And executed the LIE.
Their reasoning are: a) A Litmus test for the loyalty of the troops. b) A Litmus test for the readiness of the military for such incidents. c) A Litmus test to the Public , if they were going to react positively or negatively. Especially when the Qaranivalu being accused as well. d) Was their going to be an uprising? e) And to observe the RIPPLE EFFECT. The plan failed miserably because the PUBLIC and the COURTS could see through the LIE.
To the wrongfully accused YOU ARE TRULY UNSUNG HEROS. We will make good on our undertaking in 1,
(member 3 , in the Military Council),the biggest mistake the military did was neutralise the GCC, this cause of action was brought forward by the Muslim Clique and others(OPPORTUNISTS).
Bainimarama is so shallow, this advise will actually weaken the Military and make the military extinct.
Without the GCC the military is without a spine. No matter what Fijians will always follow our chiefs. THE RFMF IS 99% taukei.
A SOLDIER IS ONLY A SOLDIER IN THE CONFINES OF THE BARRACKS BUT WILL ALWAYS BE A TAUKEI WHEREVER HE GOES AND WHATEVER HE DOES.
The boys keep telling us stories of ‘ keimami sa dau madua na lako i nakoro, se vei ira na wekai kemami, baleta sa dau duatani na nodra raici keimami mai na sotia.”
or ” O cei o kemuni mo ni vosa vacavaca taka na Bose Levu Vakaturaga.” or
” O cei o iko moni vesuki ira na i TALATALA na talai ni KALOU, o iko vaka o sega ni kai VITI mo susugi mai na LOTU. Se mo kila na nomui vola tabu.”
A taukei is always a taukei, na vosa vaqo e dau lauti keimami na Sotia.IN SHORT NO GCC , NO RFMF.
As the Bible states ” Chiefs are ORDAINED by GOD”
Kena balebale na ka kece e kaya tiko o VOREQE & CO is from the devil.
Me da yavala na tamata lotu vakarisito.
Ni da dei na i taukei o ya me dei tiko na 3 legged stool (LOTU,VANUA,MATANITU).
E ra na qai rawa ni qaravi vinaka yani na vo ni kawa tamata.
Ia me liu tikoga na LOTU.
Posted by rawfijinews
The regional law association, LAWASIA says its up to the conscience of lawyers to decide whether they take up appointments under the interim government in Fiji.
Fiji’s Chief Justice Anthony Gates who was one of four judges reappointed to the high court on Friday says lawyers are needed to help restored the country and its institutions to normality.
Dr Gordon Hughes, a former president of LAWASIA who visited Fiji on an observer mission two years ago says the statement highlights the dilemma facing lawyers. Dr Hughes says societies can’t function without judges but lawyers are concerned that by accepting judicial appointments they are legitimising the military-led regime in Fiji. He says LAWASIA has left that decision up to individual lawyers. “The position of LAWASIA and also the Law Council of Australia has been a little bit different. They essentially leave it to the individual as a matter of conscience but they encourage the individual before they accept an appointment to give considerations to both sides of the argument.”
Dr Gordon Hughes, a former president of LAWASIA.
News Content © Radio New Zealand InternationalPO Box 123, Wellington, New Zealand
Posted by rawfijinews

Hi from New Zealand
May 25, 2009
Bula!
I found your blog through a link from the pacific media centre in Auckland, New Zealand. I’ve been watching what’s going on in Fiji with a lot of interest over the last few months, trying to work out what the right thing to do is for our family, which has long had a winter holiday on the cards.What I want to know, and haven’t been able to find out through the media as they’re generally (I guess!) trying to look at the bigger picture, is what do the REAL PEOPLE OF FIJI think. For a country whose mainstay is tourism, in times such as these is it better for tourists to keep coming or does that inadvertently support the illegal regime? Or is it better to come because at least that’s bread and butter on the table for the many families that depend on tourism income? You are probably inundated with people contacting you at the moment. If you have a spare minute some time I’d really appreciate your view. Fiji looks like a beautiful country with beautiful people. We’re keen to come as planned but want to be sure our actions aren’t in any way supporting a nut-case regime. All the best, keep up the blogging, thank goodness for the internet.
…………………….
RFN says – http://fijitoday.wordpress.com has the answer for you in one of their blog post titled ”WARNING TO ALL TOURISTS OR INVESTORS!”
The constitution has gone.
You have no basic Human Rights.
Being critical of the Regime is grounds for arrest.
New laws can be promulgated at any time at the whim of the President.
Arbitrary arrests and detention are now normal.
It is illegal to meet in groups of more than three people.
Judges can only rule if the Regime agree and there is a backlog of several months.
Trade Union officers are fired.
The Law Society is now disbanded and lawyers will be reluctant to be involved in cases against the Regime as they can be deregistered.
All senior appointments are Regime lackeys.
The Regime is not recognised as legal so is not able to be sued in the future.
The Regime is not recognised as legal and any agreements signd by them will be worthless unless agreed to by an elected Government.
Another devaluation is just around the corner.
Posted by rawfijinews
Law Society sounds alarm over Fiji judiciary move
May 25, 2009
The Fiji regime’s decision to take over issuing practising certificates for lawyers in Fiji is “very disturbing” and could undermine the rule of law there, says the New Zealand Law Society. The move was a very serious attack on the independence of the legal profession in Fiji, it said, as the Fiji government on Friday decreed that the Chief Registrar of the Court, a government employee, would take over issuing practising certificates from the Fiji Law Society. All existing certificates will expire by the end of June and lawyers will have to seek renewal from the registrar before then. Fiji government authorities raided the Fiji Law Society’s offices and removed files on Saturday night. Society president Dorsami Naidu told Radio New Zealand the new chief registrar, Ana Rokomokoti, and men in plain clothes demanded entry to the society’s Suva offices. They took confidential files relating to complaints against law society members, and the chief registrar told staff a decree had been issued effectively deregulating the society. The decree removed independence for lawyers, Mr Naidu said. The move follows the military regime’s move to reappoint judges last Friday, six weeks after firing them all. Those reinstated included two High Court justices who previously ruled that the military’s 2006 coup was legal.
New Zealand Law Society president John Marshall QC said an independent legal profession was a vital element of the rule of law. “The legal profession represents individuals in claims against the State and defends them in criminal cases brought by the State. “Lawyers must be independent of State interference to be able to represent clients freely and fearlessly,” he said.
In New Zealand, the Law Society issues practising certificates to lawyers and the Fiji Law Society had done the same for the last 12 years, Mr Marshall said. The New Zealand Law Society would watch the Fiji situation very closely and would be extremely concerned if there was any suggestion that lawyers who opposed the regime, or who act for clients who bring cases against it, were being refused practising certificates, he said. It was also concerning wide ranging changes regulation of Fiji’s legal profession had been made without consultation but simply the issuing of the decree.
Auckland queen’s counsel Peter Williams said the raid showed the regime wanted complete control, which was “not unusual for dictatorships”. Mr Williams said the government “did not want the independence of a law”. “They don’t want their activities to be reviewed, or to be in any way questioned,” he said. Fiji’s interim attorney general Aiyaz Sayed-Khayum said reforms to the society would improve transparency. Law societies in Fiji, Australia and New Zealand have urged lawyers in the three countries not to take up judicial postings to serve the regime.
Australian and New Zealand citizens often serve as judges in Fiji, which lacks enough homegrown senior lawyers.
- NZPA
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10574499
Posted by rawfijinews
spokesperson for the regional law association, LAWASIA says the interim government in Fiji will find it difficult to convince people that it won’t interfere with the licensing of lawyers. A decree has been issued stripping the Fiji Law Society of its power to issuing practicing certificates, following a raid on its offices. Dr Gordon Hughes, a past president of LAWASIA who visited Fiji on an observer mission two years ago, says this is not radical as government-appointed bodies are responsible for this in some other countries including Australia. But he says past interference with the legal system in Fiji leads people to doubt whether the new issuing body, the Chief Registrar will be completely independent. “Now that concern may or may not be well founded but its understandable that some people will form the view that the government will simply direct the relevant authority to remove the practicing certificate of someone who for political reasons they don’t approve of.” A spokesperson for LAWASIA, Dr Gordon Hughes
Posted by rawfijinews
Victor Lal to Anthony Gates : “You have sold your judicial soul to Hitler’s devil in Fiji”
May 25, 2009
Permit me (although you don’t deserve such a request for permission) to remind you of the essential case for the Rule of Law, as I understand it, by quoting a voice from a now vanished civilisation, but one which has bequeathed to mankind an intellectual and spiritual legacy that is immortal. For, inherent in the accents of that voice, is a dread warning of the consequences of disregard of the Rule of Law: “The Rule of Law”, wrote Aristotle, “is preferable to that of any individual…He who bids the law rule may be deemed to bid God and reason alone rule, but he who bids a man rule adds an element of the beast: for desire is as a wild beast, and passion perverts the minds of rulers, even when they are the best of men. The law is reason unaffected by desire.”
The abrogation of the rule of law means despotism…No point is better established in political science than the proposition that civil liberty depends on the rule of law, and the abrogation of the rule of law would mean the end of civil liberty as we have know it. In your acceptance speech you claimed that it would be a mistake to let the judiciary decay; that you and others had made a mistake previously in refusing to budge after the second coup of 1987. “All of us were dismissed. Though we felt we held the moral high ground, the ordinary people of Fiji were left abandoned. It took the continuing Chief Justice Sir Timoci Tuivaga many years to restore the numbers and many years more to catch up on backlogs and resources. The departure of the judges then can only be described as disastrous. We would have done better to have continued to serve and to play a crucial role in curbing excesses and in bringing the country and its institutions back to normality.”
You said by staying on this time and with more people coming on board to serve, “from such efforts will emerge a truly independent judiciary and in time a closer approximation to the rule of law than we have had in 20 years or more”. You are wrong, Tony! In previous coups, the judges were dismissed because they refused to give into the coupists. You and your treasonists fellow judges now back on the Bench quietly disappeared, only waiting to be called back – whether you conspired in the abrogation of the 1997 Constitution and in the suspension of the judiciary following the Fiji High Court ruling against your judgment, only time and “spies” inside the judiciary, will tell us.
King James 11, so the British House of Commons resolved on 28 January 1689, had been guilty of two main offences before he “withdrew himself out of the kingdom” and “abdicated the government”. One was “having endeavoured to subvert the constitution of the kingdom, by breaking the original contract between king and people”; the second was “by the advice of Jesuits and other wicked persons, having violated the fundamental laws”. The King was not alone. In 1681, Lord Chief Justice Scroggs was impeached, and the charge against him ran, that he had “traitorously and wickedly endeavoured to subvert the fundamental laws and the established religion and government of this kingdom: and instead therefore to introduce popery and an arbitrary and tyrannical government against the law”. Even Oliver Cromwell, whom you had evoked in your judgment in Qarase v Bainimarama was, though a tyrant and usurper, a constitutionalist at heart. You, on the other hand, so it seems to me, are no longer a constitutionalist or a respecter of law; for how else could you have acquiesced in ignoring the Fiji Court of Appeal ruling which went against you. What a great pity that you have forgotten the immortal lines from the Magna Carta, Clause 40: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay right or justice. In the end you sold your judicial soul to the Hitler’s Devil in Fiji – yes, to Adolf Sayed Khaiyum and his master Frankstein Bhainimarama.
Posted by rawfijinews
Nazhat Shameem to illegal oath taker Adolf Sayed Khaiyum
May 25, 2009
I am considering your offer to return to the Fiji High Court. Before I throw my judicial HAT, I am wondering how I will justify my role as partner in crime for taking illegal judicial oath with other treasonists. Have you seen my ruling in State v Seniloli – Judgment [2004] FJHC 534; HAC0028.2003S (5 August 2004). Here I am directing to you my words regarding Ratu Rakuita Vakalalabure, whom I jailed for six years (you know I was once his boss in the DPP’s office) and later the Fiji Law Society barred him from practising as a lawyer. Read what I told the presiding jury:“The 2nd accused does not deny taking the engagement in the nature of the oath, but he says firstly, that the oath was not a serious one and therefore he had no intention of taking the post of Attorney-General in the Speight Government, and secondly that he was compelled to take the oath.
How serious the oath-taking ceremony was is a matter of fact for you. You have seen the video footage of the ceremony, and have read the written oaths. You will also have noted that in his caution statement the 2nd accused said nothing about the ceremony being a pantomime or a show for the cameras. Nor did he say he was forced or compelled to take the oath. You have heard his unsworn statement. It is for you to decide whether the 2nd accused took the engagement of Attorney-General in the nature of an oath, or whether he was only pretending to do so for the cameras. You may also consider the 2nd accused’s speech on the 19th of May, when he sat beside Speight and said that he was pleased with the change in government and asked everyone to co-operate with him as Minister for Home Affairs to bring stability in the nation. Mr. Singh suggested to you that he must have made this speech under compulsion by George Speight, but of course the 2nd accused did not mention this in his sworn statement. He also raises the defence of compulsion.
The questions for you are:1) Was there a threat, or threats of grievous bodily harm, or death, made to him by any of the people involved in the takeover at the time of the taking of the oath?2) Was the 2nd accused in fact compelled to take the oath as a result of these threats?3) Would a reasonable person in the 2nd accused’s shoes have succumbed to the pressure?4) Did he have any opportunity to avoid the situation or escape?
In considering these questions you are entitled to take into account the arms in Parliament, the demeanour of the 2nd accused as you saw it on video, the contents of his caution interview, and his unsworn statement in Court. You may also take into account the evidence of several Parliamentarians such as Mr. Leo Smith, Mr. Tuisowaqa and Ratu Cokanauto who managed to avoid taking part in the ceremony either by outright refusal or by deception. Could the 2nd accused have done the same? Could he have left the Complex pretending that he would return? If you consider that he had an opportunity or opportunities to remove himself from Parliament thus avoiding the swearing-in, then the defence of duress is not available to him. It is for the 2nd accused to prove to you that it is more likely than not that he was compelled to take the oath. In relation to the words “purporting to bind him to commit treason” I must direct you again that the formation of an illegal government to replace a lawfully elected one, held by force in custody is treason. So that if the oath the 2nd accused swore appears or purports to bind him to act as Attorney-General to illegally replace the lawful Attorney-General in the government held by arms in custody, then the oath would appear to bind the accused to commit treason, whether or not he intended to commit treason. These are matters for you.”
Posted by rawfijinews
The three blind mice wanna blind Fijians ….. again!
May 25, 2009
Anthony Gates, Devendra Pathik and John Byrnes are Fiji’s three blind mice who wanted to blind every Fiji citizen with their thwarted high court judgment over-ruled by Fiji’s Appeals Court in favor of the democratically appointed SDL government and its leader Qarase. Now that all three are back under the illegal new order, it kinda just confirms what everyone suspected all along – that they colluded on a pre-determined high court ruling on that Qarase vs Frank & Co’s case. The character of a man is on full display during times of conflict; a time when the real you is on stage, fully exposed for everyone to see. That show time is all but over for Gates, Pathik and Brynes. They have clearly revealed who they really are by swearing oath and giving their full allegiance to an illegal order – one that has trashed and torn into bits the very essence of what these men espouse to be – guardians of the 1997 constitution and Fiji’s supreme law. But slowly and unashamedly, they have made the choice to do away with the moral of their professional life and in its place, to remain loyal and to uphold a coupmaker and a lawbreaker’s new order.
Will they be successful in blinding the Fijians?
We don’t think so!
We think Fiji is on the last segment of the show now with the wigged big kahunas giving away their allegiance to Frank & Co. before the fat lady sings!
Who and when is the fat lady gonna sing?
We won’t tell!
Let Frank & Co. keep guessing.
Posted by rawfijinews
The meaning of treason as pontified by rotten minded Anthony Gates
May 25, 2009
In my summing up in the case of The State v Villiame Savu (Cr Action HAC010.02S, Fiji High Court, 11 December 2002), I said the following: “It is now my duty to sum up the case to you. We have differing roles in this trial. I have to direct you on the law and you must accept these directions. You are to decide on the facts…misprision of treason “The Accused is charged in the information with one charge or count, and that is misprision of treason, which is an offence in our Penal Code. The first element that the prosecution must prove to you beyond reasonable doubt is “that George Speight and others intended to commit treason”. You must be satisfied that they intended to overthrow the established Government unlawfully and by force. “Treason in this sense could include forcible resistance to the authority of the government of the day in some public or general respect. Persons would be guilty of such an offence if by an armed force, however small, they sought to usurp the government in matters of a public or general nature.
“To plan to takeover Parliament by force and to throw out the Prime Minister and cabinet of the day would clearly be treasonous intents. Even if you felt the intention was merely by force to prevent the government from the free exercise of its lawful powers, such intent would be treasonous. Meeting to plan to overthrow is by itself a sufficient instance of treason, a sufficient overt act, to constitute treason.
“You are not concerned (the jury) with motive here, or politics, or “the cause”. You are here to give your opinion, bearing in mind my directions on the law, on whether the law has been broken and on whether the Accused has committed the offence of misprision of treason.”
Posted by rawfijinews
Justice John Brynes’ return to his previous judicial post raises the disturbing question whether the recently appointed judges had secretly conspired with their illegal appointing Nazi officer Adolf Sayed Khaiyum in the abrogation of the constitution and the suspension of the judiciary.
In other words, was their suspension or purported dismissal a mere charade, a tactic to ignore the Fiji Court of Appeal ruling which went in favour of the deposed Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase.
So far, we have seen the return of Gates, Pathik and Goundar. Will Nazhat Shameem, Thomas Hickie and Joceylne Scutt be making their ghostly appearances and join their treasonous judicial colleagues, and in the process “letting the law down”. The re-appointment of Gates, Pathik, Goundar and Bryne, or their treasonous acceptance of the judicial posts, raise some very disturbing questions for the meaning and place of law in the country. How will they react if their future rulings are ignored by those appearing before them – what right do these treasonous judges have to enforce their judgments when they themselves have ignored the ruling of the superior court – the Fiji Court of Appeal which overturned the judgment of Gates, Pathik and Brynes in Qararse versus Bainimarama?
Where will these judges get their precedent cases from now onwards to make legal rulings – for how can they ignore rulings of the higher court and yet sit down to hear cases in their own courts. What guarantee will be there that these bunch of treasonous judges will not become a law unto themselves – what is the purpose of having higher courts like the Fiji Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, if the very judges (Gates, Pathik and Bryne of the Fiji Court of Appeal) not accept the overturning of their own judgment against Bainimarama. It is most puerile and sickening to hear Gates justifying his re-appointment. Yes, it is one thing for the Nazi judicial officer Khaiyum to abrogate the Constitution and to suspend the judiciary, it is quite another for the judges to return to the Bench at the whim and order of Adolf Sayed Khaiyum, to be purveyors of treason.
The rule of law and the respect for the judiciary will NEVER be the same in Fiji, and IT SHOULD Never BE! Who would want to hear or come near the treasonous judicial lepers – the rapists of the 1997 Constitution and the judicial order in the country. The rule of law is now dead and buried. Forget about getting legal justice from these illegal justices in the future – they are nothing but a shame and lackeys of unconstitutionality in Fiji. It is time a brave and patriotic military officer stepped forward and ended the nightmare and abyss Fiji is facing – he will be lorded as a patriot for taking out the treasonists.
Posted by rawfijinews
Reply to reporters without borders
May 25, 2009
Hi,My name is Clothilde Le coz and I am the head of the Internet freedom desk fro Reporters Without Borders, an NGO defending press freedom and free speech.I read that 3 lawyers have been arrested during the week end, possibly because they read or contribute to your blog Raw Fiji News.Do you confirm Richard Naidu, Jon Apted and tevita Fa are 3 contributors to the Raw Fiji News ? Do you have any idea how to contact them ?All the best and thank you for your help, Clothilde
RFN says – The green goons intelligentsia might wanna answer this! Pssssst….. Leweni, you there? Have you found out who we are yet?…… Yes?…….No?….. Keep guessing bro and keep checking where the sun don’t shine!
Posted by rawfijinews
How Adolf Sayed Khaiyum is manipulating Frank Bainimarama to win the big prize
May 25, 2009
You don’t need to be a genius to understand that our dictator, the ill-educated and psychologically challenged Frank Bainimarama, cannot think strategically. A heavy drinker, braggart and delusional misfit, who is subject to sudden paranoia-driven mood changes, Frank is more boy than man. In truth, he’s not fit to run a market stall let alone an entire country. But his fear of justice in regard to his role in the 2000 coup made him so desperate that he pulled the December 2006 coup. This is where so-called caretaker attorney-general, Adolf Sayed-Khaiyum, comes in. But unlike Frank, he has a full education and has been expertly trained to think and plan strategically. Moreover, he knows the dictator’s shortcomings only too well. And we can now see only too clearly how he is cynically and consistently playing on the dictator’s frailties for his own ends.
Adolf is an Australian-qualified lawyer with additional credentials from the University of Hong Kong. He’s a well educated man. He’s far better educated than the idiot dictator, and he knows it. After two years of hard work, Adolf has finally become the dictator’s “eminence grise”, which translates as the power behind the throne. It was Adolf who convinced the dictator to abrogate the Constitution and it was Adolf who is now masterminding the setting up of our new, bogus judiciary, including the systematic dismantling of the last vestiges of our remaining legal checks and balances, namely the Fiji Law Society. A grateful dictator, who is on record as having revealed to fellow Pacific leaders that he has no knowledge whatsoever of the specific provisions of our Constitution, has given Adolf carte blanche. That’s because the strategic moves by Adolf make Frank feel good. Deep down in his dim brain Frank understands that Adolf can put a lot of distance between him and the sure justice that awaits him. But Frank is living in a fool’s paradise. He doesn’t understand that Adolf, the highly trained lawyer, has an agenda of his own, and that agenda does not include Frank. Rather, it’s all about Adolf. He is out to replace Frank, and in a nation with no Constitution and a compliant judiciary to boot, it will be a cake walk for the ambitious and strategically-thinking lawyer. With all legal levers of power at his fingertips, Adolf Sayed-Khaiyum is poised for his next major move, which will be to make Frank history and himself dictator.
Just wait and see! fijidemocracynow2009
Posted by rawfijinews

Fiji teaching institutions lose volunteers as pension reforms bite
May 25, 2009
One of Fiji’s teachers training institutions says the interim government’s removal of nearly 1,000 teachers from schools around the country is affecting both graduates and student teachers. The regime implemented the policy at the end of April, forcing public servants to retire at 55 instead of 60 in an effort to reduce the numbers of civil servants by ten percent. The Deputy Principal of the teachers training institution Fulton College, Losena Oli, says some of the graduates who had been teaching as volunteers at local mission schools have been recruited by the Government. “The Mission should seriously look into this because right now in Fiji with the devaluation and all that, life is not easy. And they should be paid accordingly rather than giving them just a sort of allowance and all that. It’s a good amount of money they get off in the government schools.” Losena Oli says she hopes the mission schools will begin paying staff in order to make up for the shortfall in teachers.
News Content © Radio New Zealand International
Posted by rawfijinews
Fiji Law Society says an attack on it by the junta is twisting the truth
May 25, 2009
The President of the Fiji Law Society says the country’s Attorney General is twisting the truth by suggesting the country’s lawyers are not properly scrutinised. Following a raid on the society offices on Saturday, a decree is to be issued stating licenses for lawyers will now be up to the military Government and new legal professional standards are to be introduced. The law society’s president, Dorsami Naidu, says the Attorney general is wrong to suggest complaints are not investigated fairly. “I think he is trying to twist it around. If there is a complaint against any of us I dont, or the law Society, does not look at it. We have senior members of the Bar going to the initial stages of the complaint. I don’t, or the Law Society does not look at it. We have senior members of the Bar going through the initial stages of the complaint. We don’t, you know, people personally involved don’t look at it.” Dorsami Naidu says the stripping of the law society’s powers is because it has not followed the orders of Fiji’s military regime.

Ex-Wellington Resident & Regime Supporter Tony Fullman Heads Fiji Water Authority



By ELENOA BASELALA

Fiji Times - Monday, May 18, 2009


THE privatisation of water has advanced a step further with the appointment of former Fiji resident Tony Fullman as the chief executive of the Water Authority of Fiji.
He has the task of helping 51 per cent of urban dwellers and 49 per cent of those living in rural areas have piped water supply.
According to a government statement, Mr Fullman has 20 years of experience in the New Zealand public sector in project management, technical skills and knowledge for continuous business improvements.
The Authority, according to a promulgation of its powers and functions by the President Ratu Josefa Iloilo, will treat and supply water and also have the legal right to power sources and the right to obtain water from sources for supply to the public.
It will also establish, operate and maintain systems for the provision of water and sewerage services and assist in the formulation and implementation of national policies or urban and rural land use planning relating to the use and control of water bodies and resources.
The authority also has the power to enforce and review policies, procedures, standards and codes of practice.
Mr Fullman has a double Masters degree in Public Management and Information Management and a post graduate Diploma of Business Administration from Victoria University of Wellington.

Monday, May 25, 2009

Warrant to Arrest: Fiji

Warrant to Arrest: Fiji
May 24, 2009
By Michael Field - www.michaelfield.org.nz
Perhaps unwittingly, one Ana Rokomokoti has thrown the entire Bainimarama dictatorship into international peril. At the very least, the Commodore will now find his travel options severely limited – somewhat like the Burmese generals and Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe. Bainimarama may well have to reflect on the fate of Augusto Pinochet, the Chilean dictator who ended up with international arrest warrants in many countries. He had to slowly decay at home in the end, his medical conditions untreated in foreign hospitals.
Bainimarama, who suffers a heart condition that cannot be treated in Fiji, had best hope that one of his goons does not whack a foreigner – or a Fijian citizen with family outside the country. For to do so now, will be to make him subject of an Interpol arrest warrant. The problem is very simple; the world no long accepts anarchy. As romantic as it might seem, dictators are becoming globally accountable for their human rights abuses. At the very pinnacle of things is the International Criminal Court for major crimes against humanity. Fortunately, the People’s Republic of Voreqe has yet to intrude into the area of its jurisdiction. That does not mean, though, that he is off the hook. Fiji, along with most other nations, has signed onto a range of international human rights conventions. They were not empty words, although perhaps Suva might have thought so at the time.
Now, of course, the world’s leaders can and do wonder the world without fear of arrest. It is called sovereign immunity to prosecution. Its based on the central assumption, made by the United Nations and the human rights treaties, that each member nation can and will fairly prosecute its own crimes. But what happens, as has happened increasingly of late, when international human rights organisations caste their lights on nations and see inadequacies and corruption. It is no long possible for an individual state to prosecute crime, especially that committed by those in power. This is where Rokomokoti comes in and may well have committed the blunder that will get Bainimarama into deep trouble. She raided the offices of the Fiji Law Society without a valid search warrant. She seized files and is apparently preparing to act against individual lawyers, without due process. She does this, nominally at least, as Registrar of the High Court. But no one is overlooking the fact that she is a Major in the Fiji Military and is subservient to its head, the self appointed dictator of Fiji. He has removed the courts and stacked them with supporters; no international tribunal will ever accept the notion that the aging president acted spontaneously on this.
Bainimarama has even closed the Human Rights Commission that so actively supported him.
It is Rokomokoti though, with her single act, who has so explicitly and clearly demonstrated the corruption and failure of the Fiji judicial system. When the military are raiding lawyers, there is no justice left. Sadly, the people of Fiji have no recourse to ending this. Bainimarama can do what he likes now, and sending some major into lawyers’ offices is military routine. But, it is being noticed.
Fiji is being watched much more closely. Names are being collected.
It is no long merely a case of Australia and New Zealand creating an immigration black list.
As Pinochet found it, his travel plans suddenly hit the brick wall when people he had never heard of, filed human rights complaints in their own countries against him. In Britain and Spain, in his case. That he was not, ultimately prosecuted, in those countries is not the point; what is important to note though is that there are a growing list of powerful countries, with active human rights goals and a lively judiciary, where sovereign immunity is a point of debate, not a bedrock point of law. Someday soon, Bainimarama could find himself sliding his passport across a desk – in Delhi or Hong Kong or Los Angeles – only to be told, there is an Interpol warrant to arrest over you.
Here is a 2004 quote from the United Nations Secretary General that is relevant to the People’s Republic of Voreqe:
"For the United Nations, the rule of law refers to a principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself, are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards. It requires, as well, measures to ensure adherence to the principles of supremacy of law, equality before the law, accountability to the law, fairness in the application of the law, separation of powers, participation in decision-making, legal certainty, avoidance of arbitrariness and procedural and legal transparency."

Vakarau na Vanua me Yalani na Bula ni Matanitu Butrako nei Voreqe

Some more stuff from someone who knows
May 25, 2009
From a few of our members in the Military Council and the high ranking military officers.
The Methodist Church has made a big mistake in trusting the military for dialogue. The COUPSTERS(people like PIO BOSCO TIKOSUVA who harp on about moving Fiji forward) and the military have claimed VICTORY in close doors that they have already smashed and defeated 2 of the 3 legged stool of the taukei. 1 Government(matanitu) and2 Great Council of Chiefs(vanua). That dialogue is for them to implement their final strike to STRIKEOUT the I-TAUKEI once and for all and that is the 3rd leg which is the most powerful and strongest. Without the 3rd , 1 & 2 cannot survive. Na mataivalu e via vamalumalumu taka na lotu. E dua tale ga na angle oratou cakava tiko o Teleni na New Methodist(Sa da kilai Vulaono vinaka mai Namaka,Nadi…butabutako) me vamalumalumu taka na Methodist Church. But the military is also wrong on the count of weakening the vanua. The vanua in the villages are only waiting for the SIGNAL from Suva as instructed in our pamphelt SA YALA EKE published QEB media cell.Our follow up process , confirmed that the vanua is READY FOR REVOLUTION and removing the illegal regime. ALL OF FIJI IS READY.The MILITARY IS RESTLESS. We cannot handle a nationwide revolt,Kemuni na nemami qaselevu, kemami veikilai vinaka tu vaturaganivalu.E levu sa tu qo era tamata lasulasu,daumateni,dauyalewa,butabutako and are very shallow.Sa sega na dina. The military is using DELAYING TACTICS to get ready. But e tubu tiko e levu na veivosaki ena kena vakayagataki na plan cava. sa malumalumu tu qo na veiliutakikei na veivabauti i na keba. Keimami veidredre tiko madaga i na OFFICERS MESS.All OPERATIONAL and STANDING ORDERS are leading to BLOODSHED. The information We are privy to is all plans for CRUSHING a REVOLT. The strategy and tactics have been redrawn. And it is a point by point move to delay THE METHODIST CHURCH with dangling carrots and cheese from dialogue.The last instruction is SHOOT TO KILL. Ni vosota na turaga kei na marama we can’t reveal our identities but we are everywhere within the apparatus if we show you documents our identities will be compromised andwe are very close to everything.Dont ever say good things about Driti and Mara in RFN , these bastards are willing to shoot innocent civilians.But our NCO’s are already brainwashing the boys not to harm any civilians. They can issue orders till the cows come home. the boys won’t shoot.You have been played and swindled with Bullshit. O ira sa tu qo e ra sega ni tamata me ra vakabauti. The quality officers are all gone. There is no more honourable men left, except a few of us left at major and above and NCOs sGT to WO1.Keimami sa bole mate tu qo e na keba me keimami vanalaki Bainimarama,Teleni,Kean,Driti,Ului,Aziz,Leweni,Qilio and Saumatua,E ra na varau veitau sobo i veitavioka. Sa qai o koya qo na ka dina, sega ni ratou o Ballu Khan. Keimami rarawa valevu na nomuni lewe ni mataivalu e na nomuni sa vasuka moni veitalanoa. Me ia ga na Protest. Keitou qai neitou i tavi na Queen Elizabeth Barracks kei na vo ni ka vakaivalu. Na noda vakabauta me cakacaka taki, dua na siga da sucu e na dua na siga e da mate. Noda mate e lewa ga na Kalou bula,sega ni mai o iratou na mataivalu se tamata, e lewa na noda kalou. Kalou kaukauwa na noda Kalou. Sa Yala Eke